September 2004 - U-Boot

[U-Boot-Users] Runtime switch from uart0 to uart1?
by Travis Sawyer 15 Sep '04

15 Sep '04

Greetings: After having read the README and some code, I was wondering if there is a way to switch, at runtime (rather than at compile time) from UART0 to UART1. The board is the ocotea, ppc440gx, u-boot 1.1.2, build tools from ELDK3 TIA, Travis

3 6

[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Pass full u-boot environment to booting kernel
by Pantelis Antoniou 15 Sep '04

15 Sep '04

Hi The following patch allows the passing of the full u-boot environment to the booting running kernel. What it does after that is a matter of discussion currently. In the following days I'll also post patches for the kernel and busybox showing what can be acheived. Regards Pantelis * Patch by Pantelis Antoniou, 14 Sep 2004: Pass full current environment to linux. README | 9 +++++++ common/cmd_bootm.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

6 14

[U-Boot-Users] soft or hard I2C code for AT91RM9200?
by David A. Peters 15 Sep '04

15 Sep '04

Does anyone have I2C code for the AT92RM9200 that they would be willing to share? I am trying to get the soft I2C working, but I am struggling. Thank you!

1 1

RE: [U-Boot-Users] MPC8272ADS and uboot program check
by VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE) 15 Sep '04

15 Sep '04

> -----Original Message----- > From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Bastos > Fernandez Alexandre > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 8:48 AM > To: 'u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net' > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] MPC8272ADS and uboot program check > > > Hi to all, > > After some days working ok with my MPC8272ADS board, now it > keeps rebooting > all the time with a Program Check report. It has arrived after a hang. > > I have been checking the output as this is all the > information i have at the > moment. I have realized that clock reporting is incoherent > (the true one is > cpu_clk=400Mhz), so i wonder if it has any relation. > > Any idea? > > > The output I get is: > > > U-Boot 1.0.0 (Jun 30 2004 - 20:20:47) > > MPC8272 Reset Status: Check Stop, External Soft, External Hard > > MPC8272 Clock Configuration > - Bus-to-Core Mult 4x, VCO Div 2, 60x Bus Freq 25-75 , Core > Freq 100-300 > - dfbrg 1, corecnf 0x0a, busdf 3, cpmdf 1, plldf 0, pllmf 3 > - vco_out 400000000, scc_clk 100000000, brg_clk 25000000 > - cpu_clk 400000000, cpm_clk 200000000, bus_clk 100000000 > > CPU: MPC8272 (HiP7 Rev 13, Mask 0.1 0K50M) at 18.382000 MHz > Board: Motorola MPC8272ADS > I2C: ready > DRAM: 64 MB [garbage snipped] > 8 MB > *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment > > pci init start-----pci init end > In: serial > Out: serial > Err: serial > NIP: 03F968D8 XER: 20000000 LR: 03FB621C REGS: 03f3fdd8 TRAP: > 0700 DAR: > 03FB5374 > MSR: 00083002 EE: 0 PR: 0 FP: 1 ME: 1 IR/DR: 00 > > GPR00: CCC0E043 03F3FEC8 E7FFFFFF 00000001 00000000 00000010 000003A0 > 000003C4 > GPR08: 00000264 B0FFFFFB 03FC86D0 001A6306 48002024 E7FFF3BF 03FC8000 > 058A0000 > GPR16: FBFF9F7B FF7FFFED 00000000 FE729328 00003002 00000001 00000000 > 03FA3098 > GPR24: 03FA390C 00000000 00000010 00000000 00000000 03F3FF64 00000020 > F0010D40 > Call backtrace: > Program Check Exception First of all, I would acknowleging that Wolfgang is probably right and you probably have a hardware problem. In case that is not true, my follow-up questions and observations are... #1 question in debugging: what changed between when it last worked and now? Looking at the above, what is the software trying to do when all the garbage is being spewed out (just before it prints "8MB"? What it is doing is likely related to the problem. Did the board previously print the correct clock rate, or has it always been wrong? Why is it wrong? #1 rule in debugging: always fix the known bugs before hunting for the unknown, known (but discounted and ignored) bugs tend to cause additional "unknown bugs" in strange and mysterious ways. gvb ****************************************** The following messages are brought to you by the Lawyers' League of IdioSpeak: ****************************************** The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. ******************************************

1 0

[U-Boot-Users] problem about mounting rootfs
by liuyong 15 Sep '04

15 Sep '04

these u-boot infomation => imi ## Checking Image at 0c000000 ... Image Name: liuyong ramdisk Created: 2004-09-15 7:10:35 UTC Image Type: PowerPC Linux RAMDisk Image (gzip compressed) Data Size: 475451 Bytes = 464.3 kB Load Address: 00000000 Entry Point: 00000000 Verifying Checksum ... OK => imi 400000 ## Checking Image at 00400000 ... Image Name: Linux-2.6.8 Created: 2004-09-15 7:20:46 UTC Image Type: PowerPC Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed) Data Size: 873273 Bytes = 852.8 kB Load Address: 00000000 Entry Point: 00000000 Verifying Checksum ... OK => bootm 400000 Kernel command line: console=ttyS0,115200n8 root=/dev/ram0 initrd=0xc000000,4m ip=off ................ RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size 1024 blocksize ................ Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(1,0) ----------------------------------------------------------------- what's wrong? 　　　　　　　　liuyong 　　　　　　　　ly(a)ncic.ac.cn 　　　　　　　　　　2004-09-15

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] problem about mounting rootfs
by liuyong 15 Sep '04

15 Sep '04

these u-boot infomation => imi ## Checking Image at 0c000000 ... Image Name: liuyong ramdisk Created: 2004-09-15 7:10:35 UTC Image Type: PowerPC Linux RAMDisk Image (gzip compressed) Data Size: 475451 Bytes = 464.3 kB Load Address: 00000000 Entry Point: 00000000 Verifying Checksum ... OK => imi 400000 ## Checking Image at 00400000 ... Image Name: Linux-2.6.8 Created: 2004-09-15 7:20:46 UTC Image Type: PowerPC Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed) Data Size: 873273 Bytes = 852.8 kB Load Address: 00000000 Entry Point: 00000000 Verifying Checksum ... OK => bootm 400000 Kernel command line: console=ttyS0,115200n8 root=/dev/ram0 initrd=0xc000000,4m ip=off ................ RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size 1024 blocksize ................ Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(1,0) ----------------------------------------------------------------- what's wrong? 　　　　　　　　liuyong 　　　　　　　　ly(a)ncic.ac.cn 　　　　　　　　　　2004-09-15

1 0

Re: [U-Boot-Users] Re: [PATCH] - fixed missing System ACE CF device
by Stephen Williams 15 Sep '04

15 Sep '04

Hi, Sean Chang wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > >>| >>| If nothing comes around, I will probably have to add another condition >>| to the added System ACE define (?). >>| >>| Wolfgang, could you hold off on this patch for now? Thanks. >>| >>| Well, in the mean time, wish you guys have a nice weekend. >> >>I am trying to find the time to ackle this for you, but I have >>a long list of tasks at the moment. I really do want to get this >>figured out so we can come to concensus on this for the good of >>all. >> >>A little patience, and I'll try to help work this out. >> A while ago, you submitted some patches to System ACE support that I had trouble with. I found the source of the difficulty, and I *think* I sent you a means to fix the patch so that it worked with my board. Fixed a real bug, it did. Where do we stand now on getting your patches integrated? If you remember, you had one patch that accounted for varying bus width, and another that added better partition support. It was the latter that required some debug. I think Wolfgang set the patches aside. Would you like to resubmit them? -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep."

1 0

Re: [U-Boot-Users] problems with booting kernel!
by Sam Song 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

haigao <g_hai(a)huawei.com> wrote: > => printenv > bootcmd=bootp 1000000; setenv bootargs root=ramfs > console=ttyS00,9600 Pls check your environment settings above. Perhaps you should set like this: bootcmd=bootp; setenv bootargs console=ttyS0,9600 root=/dev/nfs rw ip=$(ipaddr):$(serverip):$(gatewayip):$(netmask):$(hostname)::off; bootm 'root=ramfs and console=ttyS00' is quite strange for me. > ethact=i82559#0 My ethact is 'ethact=SCC ETHERNET'. > ## Checking Image at 01000000 ... > > Image Name: Linux-2.4.24-pre2 Uhmmm, I suspect you use the kernel source in ELDK3.0. Right? > Booting progress->[0x8 ]## Current stack ends > at 0x0FFB1BB8 => set upper l > imit to 0x00800000 > > ## cmdline at 0x007FFF00 ... 0x007FFF00 > > bd address = 0x0FFB1FC8 > > memstart = 0x00000000 > > memsize = 0x10000000 > > flashstart = 0xFF000000 > > flashsize = 0x00800000 > > flashoffset = 0x00000000 > > sramstart = 0x00000000 > > sramsize = 0x00000000 > > bootflags = 0x00000001 > > intfreq = -165.-993 MHz The value is a little weird to me. Maybe sth wrong on Power-on init circuit. My custom board also had such a fault with CPU freq. and hanged later. > Booting progress->[0xe ]No initrd I guess you didn't have ramdisk on your target for you didn't set 'ramdisk_addr'. This is also the reason why I suggest you use 'root=/dev/nfs' rather than 'root=/dev/ram' in bootargs. > > ## Transferring control to Linux (at address > 00000000) ... > --Boundary_(ID_MEOpiNTH9mtRQP5BVjrzNw) Content-type: text/html; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Pls never send HTML to this list. Plain text is well accepted. W.D. don't like to see it. :-) Best regards, Sam _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 150万曲MP3疯狂搜，带您闯入音乐殿堂 http://music.yisou.com/ 美女明星应有尽有，搜遍美图、艳图和酷图 http://image.yisou.com 1G就是1000兆，雅虎电邮自助扩容！ http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/1g/*http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/event/mail_…

2 3

[U-Boot-Users] NAND heads up: Beta testers needed.
by Pantelis Antoniou 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

Hi all Since I'm preparing to send the NAND rewrite patch, I'm asking for people that use NAND to contact me if they want to beta test it. That way they can be sure that when commited will work fine with their boards. Regards Pantelis

3 3

[U-Boot-Users] MPC8540 gigabit ethernet
by Scott Harper 14 Sep '04

14 Sep '04

Hello, We are having problem getting gigbit ethernet working with u-boot on our board. I suspect that we have a hardware problem but I am double checking to make sure that I am not missing anything. u-boot with 8540ADS board and gigabit works fine. u-boot with our 8540 board gigabit has checksum errors as seen by etherreal. our 8540 board 100Mbit works fine in all modes. We are using the same PHY as the 8540ADS (Marvell 88E1011S) Since 100Megabit works and Gigabit doesn't have I missed a configuration or is this really a hardware problem. Scott

1 0

[U-Boot-Users] problems with booting kernel!
by haigao 13 Sep '04

13 Sep '04

Hi, when I boot linux with UBoot on my custom board, nothing but it hangs there. The following is the output infomation throught serial port. What's the most probable cause of this problem? Thank you for your advices. regards Hai gao ### main_loop: bootcmd="bootp 1000000; setenv bootargs root=ramfs console=ttyS00 ,9600 ip=$(ipaddr):$(serverip):$(rootpath):$(gatewayip):$(netmask):$(hostname):e th0:none; bootm" => => tftpboot 0x1000000 vmlinux.UBoot Trying i82559#0 Using i82559#0 device TFTP from server 10.71.58.94; our IP address is 10.71.58.110 Filename 'vmlinux.UBoot'. Load address: 0x1000000 Loading: ################################################################# ################################################################# done Bytes transferred = 664908 (a254c hex) => printenv bootcmd=bootp 1000000; setenv bootargs root=ramfs console=ttyS00,9600 ip=$(ipadd r):$(serverip):$(rootpath):$(gatewayip):$(netmask):$(hostname):eth0:none; bootm baudrate=38400 loads_echo=1 ethaddr=00:00:5b:ee:de:ad ethact=i82559#0 bootdelay=-1 stdin=serial stdout=serial stderr=serial filesize=a254c fileaddr=1000000 ipaddr=10.71.58.110 serverip=10.71.58.94 Environment size: 357/16380 bytes => imi 0x1000000 ## Checking Image at 01000000 ... Image Name: Linux-2.4.24-pre2 Image Type: PowerPC Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed) Data Size: 664844 Bytes = 649.3 kB Load Address: 00000000 Entry Point: 00000000 Verifying Checksum ... OK => bootm 0x1000000 Booting progress->[0x1 ]## Booting image at 01000000 ... Booting progress->[0x2 ] Booting progress->[0x3 ] Image Name: Linux-2.4.24-pre2 Image Type: PowerPC Linux Kernel Image (gzip compressed) Data Size: 664844 Bytes = 649.3 kB Load Address: 00000000 Entry Point: 00000000 Verifying Checksum ... OK Booting progress->[0x4 ] Booting progress->[0x5 ] Booting progress->[0x6 ] Uncompressing Kernel Image ... OK Booting progress->[0x7 ] Booting progress->[0x8 ]## Current stack ends at 0x0FFB1BB8 => set upper l imit to 0x00800000 ## cmdline at 0x007FFF00 ... 0x007FFF00 bd address = 0x0FFB1FC8 memstart = 0x00000000 memsize = 0x10000000 flashstart = 0xFF000000 flashsize = 0x00800000 flashoffset = 0x00000000 sramstart = 0x00000000 sramsize = 0x00000000 bootflags = 0x00000001 intfreq = -165.-993 MHz busfreq = 99 MHz ethaddr = 00:00:5B:EE:DE:AD IP addr = 10.71.58.110 baudrate = 38400 bps Booting progress->[0xe ]No initrd ## Transferring control to Linux (at address 00000000) ... Booting progress->[0xf ]

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] bug report for ocotea
by liuyong 12 Sep '04

12 Sep '04

my u-boot version is 1.1.1 i use OCOTEA board, i find some bugs about emac address. ---------------------------------------------------- in the file include/configs/OCOTEA.h LINE 157 change #define CONFIG_ETHADDR1 00:04:AC:E3:28:8B #define CONFIG_ETHADDR2 00:04:AC:E3:28:8C #define CONFIG_ETHADDR3 00:04:AC:E3:28:8D into #define CONFIG_ETH1ADDR 00:04:AC:E3:28:8B #define CONFIG_ETH2ADDR 00:04:AC:E3:28:8C #define CONFIG_ETH3ADDR 00:04:AC:E3:28:8D -------------------------------------------------- in the file common/enviroment.c add the content #ifdef CONFIG_ETH3ADDR "eth3addr=" MK_STR(CONFIG_ETH3ADDR) "\0" #endif into below LINE 132 LINE 130: #ifdef CONFIG_ETH2ADDR LINE 131: "eth2addr=" MK_STR(CONFIG_ETH2ADDR) "\0" LINE 132: #endif --------------------------------------------------- in the file common/env_common.c add the content #ifdef CONFIG_ETH3ADDR "eth3addr=" MK_STR(CONFIG_ETH3ADDR) "\0" #endif into below LINE 96 LINE 94: #ifdef CONFIG_ETH2ADDR LINE 95: "eth2addr=" MK_STR(CONFIG_ETH2ADDR) "\0" LINE 96: #endif ----------------------------------------------------- please check them. 　　　　　　　　liuyong 　　　　　　　　ly(a)ncic.ac.cn 　　　　　　　　　　2004-09-11

3 2

RE: [U-Boot-Users] ppc440gx
by Barbier, Renaud (GE Infrastructure) 12 Sep '04

12 Sep '04

ok I think I found the problem I have with exception. It would appear that for some reason the vector 0x500 gets assigned the UnkownException handler instead of external_interrupt when I look at the end label in memory. The last two values are the same and will be the offset to UnknownException 488: 03fc3bc8 48c: 03fc319c 588: 03fc3bc8 58c: 03fc319c Any idea what may be broken here.? -----Original Message----- From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Barbier, Renaud (GE Infrastructure) Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 2:49 PM To: Ralph Siemsen Cc: u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] ppc440gx that is what I am looking for but TSR and TCR are always cleared. the interrupt should not come unless... -----Original Message----- From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Ralph Siemsen Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 2:26 PM To: Barbier, Renaud (GE Infrastructure) Cc: u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] ppc440gx Barbier, Renaud (GE Infrastructure) wrote: > kgdb: handle_exception; trap [0xb00] > > I am not sure what is the source of this exception. (decrementer should be 0x900) > > Before that I was getting exception 0x500(external interrupt) and trace it to the UIC registers(polarity, trigger,...) being cleared (where?). > So I restore their value in interrrupt_init_cpu. My numbers don't quite agree with yours... but I think you might be seeing "Fixed Interval Timer" as the source of the exception. Sounds like you are enabling interrupts before the handlers have been registered. Just a guess, probably others know better... -Ralph ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idP47&alloc_id808&op=ick _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

2 1

RE: [U-Boot-Users] Where is the ppc-8xx-gcc
by VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE) 12 Sep '04

12 Sep '04

My experience with ELDK (either due to my 82xx target or my ignorance) is that the prefix is ppc-linux- rather than ppc-8xx. You can override this by creating and exporting the symbol CROSS_COMPILE. E.g., in bash run: $ export CROSS_COMPILE=ppc-linux- You can also edit the top level Makefile in u-boot to change the definion of CROSS_COMPILE to your favorite prefix to effect the same thing. You will also need the tools (ppc-linux-gcc & co.) in your $PATH if it isn't already, most easily done in your .bashrc file. export PATH=$PATH:<ppc_tools_path> gvb > -----Original Message----- > From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of > T Michael > Turney > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:04 PM > To: Wang, Chao (Charles); u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] Where is the ppc-8xx-gcc > > > > You need a cross-development toolchain. > For the PPC, why not try ELDK 3.0? > http://www.denx.de > Cheers, > T.mike > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf > Of Wang, Chao > > (Charles) > > Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:00 PM > > To: u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Where is the ppc-8xx-gcc > > > > > > > > > > When I tried to build the boot code, it came out that no > ppc-8xx-gcc was > > found. Where can I get ppc-8xx-gcc? ****************************************** The following messages are brought to you by the Lawyers' League of IdioSpeak: ****************************************** The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. ******************************************

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] Using U-boot for CSB250
by calvin 12 Sep '04

12 Sep '04

Hi, Has anybody tried to compile U-boot for CSB250 ? Any pointers ? Excuse me for posting it again. Thanks and regards, Pooja

1 0

[U-Boot-Users] FEC and TSEC in MPC8540...
by sivam 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Hi All, I am trying to use both TSEC and FEC interface in MPC8540 in U-Boot . Is it possible for me to use both the interface in U-Boot and ping from outside thro' these 2 interfaces ?. Right now i could use only one interface i.e TSEC ?. Can anyone shed some light on this. Thanks and Regards sivam

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] USB for MPC8248
by RUSSELL PETERSON 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Hello, Has anyone added the MPC8248 USB driver to U-Boot yet? I have contacted Arabella and they seem nice enough (they are sending me a CD)... But I was hoping to download it today so I can review some things ASAP. Regards, Russell

1 0

[U-Boot-Users] problem about booting kenrel
by 刘勇 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

my cpu is 440gx and my board is OCOTEA. (1)now i use bootm 0x400000, at the same time, i set bootargs into console=ttyS0,15200n8 or console=ttySICC,15200n8, but linux kernel always print little infomation. i don't know which serial name used. (2)i use ppc_md.progress as my print function.i find after kernel maps io address with ioremap64() and visit the address, kernel die. ocotea_setup_arch() in the DIR arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ocotea.c addr = ioremap64(OCOTEA_MAC_BASE, OCOTEA_MAC_SIZE); for (i=0; i< 4; i++) { mac64 = simple_strtoull(addr+OCOTEA_MAC_OFFSET*i, 0, 16); ....... when the 440gx goes into simple_strtoull, it never returns. 　　　　　　　　ly(a)ncic.ac.cn 　　　　　　　　　　2004-09-10

3 2

[U-Boot-Users] problem about booting kernel
by 刘勇 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

my cpu is 440gx and my board is OCOTEA. now i use bootm 0x400000, at the same time, i set bootargs into console=ttyS0,15200n8 or console=ttySICC,15200n8, but linux kernel always print little infomation. i use ppc_md.progress as my print function.i find after kernel maps io address with ioremap64() and visit the address, kernel die. ocotea_setup_arch() in the DIR arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/ocotea.c addr = ioremap64(OCOTEA_MAC_BASE, OCOTEA_MAC_SIZE); for (i=0; i<4; i++) { mac64 = simple_strtoull(addr+OCOTEA_MAC_OFFSET*i, 0, 16); ....... when the 440gx goes into simple_strtoull, it never returns. 　　　　　　　　ly(a)ncic.ac.cn 　　　　　　　　　　2004-09-10

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] Where is the ppc-8xx-gcc
by Wang, Chao (Charles) 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

When I tried to build the boot code, it came out that no ppc-8xx-gcc was found. Where can I get ppc-8xx-gcc? -----Original Message----- From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Tadas Sent: 2004年9月10日 9:31 To: u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [U-Boot-Users] What is the most simple ppc405gp board What ppc405gp board is cheapest, and have minimum hardware? Or more excactly, which board DO NOT have real time clock and preferably no fpga. and if the ram is integrated with no upgrade support it would be perfect. I want to use its code as referense. if the board have something more then it is hard to remove. And maybe someone know is it posible tu run linux without RTC? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

3 2

[U-Boot-Users] hardware I2C driver for at91rm9200
by David A. Peters 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Is there a hardware driver available for the AT91RM9200 when selecting CFG_HARD_I2C? Is it best to just use CFG_SOFT_I2C?

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] MPC8540 FEC/TSEC -Issues while enabling both controllers
by Sudhakar 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Hi all.. I have some issues in Uboot while enabling both the controllers FEC/TSEC in MPC8540 based board.. Individually they are working fine..but when enabled together , both are not working. Now im trying to analyze why they are not working ? If anyone can provide me details to enable both it would save some time for me. -- Thanks and Regards, Sudhakar V

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] Reading image header from linux
by David Ho 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Hi Wolfgang, I'm currently building in upgrade support for the linux kernel. My approach right now is just having 2 kernel partitions and communicate to u-boot via the u-boot environment the test a kernel in a partition and set a partition to default. One of the things that I like to be able to do is display the image information to the user from linux. Will mkimage have a feature to read /dev/mtdx for example to give me the image header info? I don't know if you have considered displaying the CRC of the image as part of the info, this would help differentiate kernel builds even if the images name and size have not changed from previous builds. This is especially useful for managing multiple kernels in a system. David

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] Execute in place
by Marcelo Leal 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

How can I configure the kernel to execute in place (XIP) with u-boot? I'm using the innovator (omap1510). Thanks. Marcelo. - Marcelo Leal mcfleal(a)yahoo.com.br CPqD Telecom & IT Solutions __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

4 7

[U-Boot-Users] MPC8540 FEC/TSEC -Issues while enabling both controllers
by Sudhakar 09 Sep '04

09 Sep '04

Hi all.. I have some issues in Uboot while enabling both the controllers FEC/TSEC in MPC8540 based board.. Individually they are working fine..but when enabled together , both are not working. Now im trying to analyze why they are not working ? If anyone can provide me details to enable both it would save some time for me. -- Thanks and Regards, Sudhakar V

1 0