July 2004 - U-Boot

[U-Boot-Users] Debug U-Boot with BDI2000 (Dongyan Chai)
by chaidy＠lenovo.com 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

I am debugging the u-boot(1.1.1) with BDI2000. I set only one breakpoint in ddd as: (gdb)b nand_probe then I typed: (gdb)c (gdb)n (gdb)n at this point, the gdb hung. At the bdi2000 telnet window, the follow message appeared: "# TARGET: all hardware breakpoints in use" Why and how can I resolve this problem? Regards, Dongyan Chai

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] eepro100 in u-boot
by петр петров 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

Hello! I am porting u-boot to smdk2800 bord and use the eepro100 eth. card. I loaded the linux kernel image, but there are errors in the loaded image - approximitely 1bit to every 5KB. When I try to launch the kernel it prints message about crc error and then breaks. I have printed the internal card statistics and it sais, that no crc errors had been detected. Also I checked the configuration byte 8(bit 1)( having dumped the internal registers). It is correctly set up to 1 - that means card had been forced to check the control sum. Can you give any idea of what could go wrong. Thank you in advance, Kirnasov A.

2 1

RE: [U-Boot-Users] U-boot saveenv Error: start and/or end address not on sector bou ndary
by VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE) 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

Your environment start and/or end address is not on a sector boundary. Check your configuration: what is your environment start address and end address? What are the addresses of the sector boundaries of the flash you are attempting to save this into? Do they line up? I suspect not. gvb > -----Original Message----- > From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of > Povolotsky, Alexander > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 6:02 AM > To: 'u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net' > Cc: 'wd(a)denx.de' > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] U-boot saveenv Error: start and/or end address > not on sector bou ndary > > > Hi, > > I have problem with saveenv on Motorola's ADS (8270) > Could someone help please with the hint how to resolve this? > > Thanks, > Best regards, > alex povolotsky > ************** > => printenv > bootdelay=5 > ethaddr=00:11:22:33:44:55 > bootcmd=bootm fff80000 > baudrate=19200 > bootargs=root=/dev/nfs rw > nfsroot=172.16.246.111:/home/gaiotto/fadsroot > stdin=serial > stdout=serial > stderr=serial > filesize=992d2 > ipaddr=172.16.119.3 > serverip=172.16.240.200 > > Environment size: 248/262140 bytes > => saveenv > Saving Environment to Flash... > Error: start and/or end address not on sector boundary > => > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users > ****************************************** The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. ******************************************

1 0

[U-Boot-Users] Re: U-Boot-Users digest, Vol 1 #861 - 14 msgs
by Rakesh Jagota 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

Hi all, >From where can I download latest u-boot. Thanks & Regards, Rakesh Jagota ----- Original Message ----- From: <u-boot-users-request(a)lists.sourceforge.net> To: <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 5:49 AM Subject: U-Boot-Users digest, Vol 1 #861 - 14 msgs > Send U-Boot-Users mailing list submissions to > u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > u-boot-users-request(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of U-Boot-Users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: More 8540/8560 ADS Patches Soon (Jon Loeliger) > 2. ppc4xx/serial.c (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Seingier_Fran=E7ois-Xavier?=) > 3. RE: [u-boot-users]: Relocation code on Nios (Scott McNutt) > 4. Debugging U-Boot Under DDD (Talib Alim) > 5. Re: Debugging U-Boot Under DDD (Wolfgang Denk) > 6. Re: Debugging U-Boot Under DDD (Matthew McClintock) > 7. RE: Debugging U-Boot Under DDD (VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE)) > 8. Re: Debugging U-Boot Under DDD (Talib Alim) > 9. Re: Debugging U-Boot Under DDD (Wolfgang Denk) > 10. Help with serial port set-up for PPC 8540 (Junita Ajith) > 11. Errant Tab in drivers/cfi_flash.c (Michael Bendzick) > 12. Re: Help with serial port set-up for PPC 8540 (Wolfgang Denk) > 13. Re: Errant Tab in drivers/cfi_flash.c (Wolfgang Denk) > 14. Re: Debugging U-Boot Under DDD (Talib Alim) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] More 8540/8560 ADS Patches Soon > From: Jon Loeliger <jdl(a)freescale.com> > To: u-boot-users <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Organization: > Date: 12 Jul 2004 11:20:42 -0500 > > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 17:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > > > I reject the following parts: > > > > cpu/mpc85xx/spd_sdram.c: > > > > ... > > > > All the rest: added & checked in. > > Cool. Thanks. > > > ... > > > > Please feel free to go on now. > > Will do. No problem about the spd_sdram.c as essentially > the entire purpose of the next patch is to improve large > portions of that code. > > Thanks, > jdl > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:23:16 +0200 > From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Seingier_Fran=E7ois-Xavier?= <Francois-Xavier.Seingier(a)thomson.net> > To: "U-Boot-Users $E-mail$" <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] ppc4xx/serial.c > > hello, > I've been going through the code of the function serial_init because I = > couldn't get the proper baudrate divisor. I must admit I don't = > understand the operations made to calculate udiv and bdiv... According = > to the 405gp user manual, these are the meanings of a few parameters. > > CFG_BASE_BAUD =3D SerClk / 16 > > bdiv =3D SerClk / (16 * baudrate) > > SerClk =3D cpu_freq / udiv > > > > As a result, udiv and bdiv should be generated as follows in = > serail_init: > > if external_clock: > > SerClk =3D CFG_EXT_SERIAL_CLK > udiv =3D 1 > > else: > > SerClk =3D CFG_BASE_BAUD * 16 > udiv =3D cpu_freq / serClk > > endif > > bdiv =3D SerClk / (16 * baudrate) > > Am I missing something? > > regards, > > Fran=E7ois-Xavier SEINGIER > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > From: Scott McNutt <ScottM(a)orbacom.com> > To: u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:01:26 -0400 > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] RE: [u-boot-users]: Relocation code on Nios > > > >> I don"t understand this particular line of code: > >> > >> ld %g7, [%g7] > > This moves the value pointed to by %g7 into register > %g7. %g7 points to the location that stores the address > of _start. This is the address where u-boot is to be > copied (the destination address). > > >> Per my understanding, %g7 keeps the return address. > >> This address should point to the next instruction > >> of code just after the delay slot of CALL or BSR > >> used to call u-boot. > > Yes, you are correct. %g7 points to where the (link time) > address of _start is stored (not the current execution > address of _start). > > >> later this value (instruction bytes) is compared with > >> %g5 that keeps the end of data segment according to > >> u-boot.lds. I can"t understand why code address is > >> being compared with instruction bytes. Please > >> explain if possible - what does [%g7] keep and where > >> am I wrong? > > This just lets you store u-boot in memory at any address. > When you being execution, the code is simply copied to > TEXT_BASE, that's all. This initial bsr just lets us > know where we begin execution, the value in %g7 after > the bsr is the target address plus 4. > > Currently, for convenience and simplicity, the u-boot > code, data, and command table are currently located > contiguously. > > There's no magic here ... just load the binary to > some arbitrary address, then single step through the > code -- it'll help you understand :-) > > Best Regards, > --Scott > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:08:24 -0700 (PDT) > From: Talib Alim <talibalm(a)hotmail.com> > Reply-To: talibalm(a)hotmail.com > To: U-Boot List <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Debugging U-Boot Under DDD > > This may be a trivial question, but I hope that someone can answer me. > I am bring up u-boot on 8xx. > > While doing source level debugging under ddd, whenever I do step, > stepi, next or nexti I see green instruction pointer jump all over the > code. e.g. it would go to first line, than third line, than 7 line. If > I look at machine code window, it is running in normal predictable way. > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > To: talibalm(a)hotmail.com > Cc: U-Boot List <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Debugging U-Boot Under DDD > From: Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)denx.de> > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:17:58 +0200 > > In message <20040712190824.57774.qmail(a)web50510.mail.yahoo.com> you wrote= > : > > This may be a trivial question, but I hope that someone can answer me. > > It's not a trivial question, but a FAQ. > > > While doing source level debugging under ddd, whenever I do step, > > stepi, next or nexti I see green instruction pointer jump all over the > > code. e.g. it would go to first line, than third line, than 7 line. If > > I look at machine code window, it is running in normal predictable way. > > See http://www.denx.de/twiki/bin/view/DULG/DebuggingTricks > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > --=20 > Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux > Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd(a)denx.de > When it is incorrect, it is, at least *authoritatively* incorrect. > - Hitchiker's Guide To The Galaxy > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Debugging U-Boot Under DDD > From: Matthew McClintock <mcclintock(a)freescale.com> > Reply-To: mcclintock(a)freescale.com > To: talibalm(a)hotmail.com > Cc: U-Boot List <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:18:08 +0000 > > See: http://www.denx.de/twiki/bin/view/DULG/DebuggingTricks > > Matthew > > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 19:08, Talib Alim wrote: > > This may be a trivial question, but I hope that someone can answer me. > > I am bring up u-boot on 8xx. > > > > While doing source level debugging under ddd, whenever I do step, > > stepi, next or nexti I see green instruction pointer jump all over the > > code. e.g. it would go to first line, than third line, than 7 line. If > > I look at machine code window, it is running in normal predictable way. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot-Users mailing list > > U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users > -- > Matthew McClintock <mcclintock(a)freescale.com> > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] Debugging U-Boot Under DDD > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:21:43 -0600 > From: "VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE)" <Gerald.VanBaren(a)smiths-aerospace.com> > To: "U-Boot List" <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of=0D > > Talib Alim > > Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 3:08 PM > > To: U-Boot List > > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Debugging U-Boot Under DDD > >=0D > >=0D > > This may be a trivial question, but I hope that someone can answer me. > > I am bring up u-boot on 8xx. > >=0D > > While doing source level debugging under ddd, whenever I do step, > > stepi, next or nexti I see green instruction pointer jump all over the > > code. e.g. it would go to first line, than third line, than 7 line. If > > I look at machine code window, it is running in normal=0D > > predictable way. > > > That is typically because the compiler optimizer has re-ordered your= > program. ddd is showing you which line is being executed and the machine= > code window shows sequential instructions, but those instructions are= > _not_ for sequential source lines. > > gvb > > > > > ****************************************** > The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain= > confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the= > individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to= > legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should= > notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from= > your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any= > purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or= > opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do= > not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should= > check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The= > company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or= > indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. > ****************************************** > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 12:43:03 -0700 (PDT) > From: Talib Alim <talibalm(a)hotmail.com> > Reply-To: talibalm(a)hotmail.com > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Debugging U-Boot Under DDD > To: Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)denx.de>, talibalm(a)hotmail.com > Cc: U-Boot List <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > > Thanks for the link. > > I have debugged u-boot to a point, it has relocated code, setup > execptions / interrrupts etc and in main_loop(). > > At this point if I "Cont", I get pop-up from ddd > > /.../u-boot-1.1.1/serial.c: No such file or directory. > > There are 23 serial.c files in the tree. Those possibly relavent to me > are > > ./cpu/mpc8xx/serial.c > ./tools/gdb/serial.c > ./drivers/serial.c > > Just before relocating the code, I typed following statements > > (gdb) symbol-file > (gdb) add-symbol-file u-boot 0xbda000 > (gdb) dir cpu/mpc8xx > (gdb) dir board/fads > (gdb) dir tools/gdb/serial.c > (gdb) dir drivers/serial.c > > Well, my question is why I am getting "No such file or directory" from > ddd and how can I fix this problem. > > Usman > > --- Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)denx.de> wrote: > > In message <20040712190824.57774.qmail(a)web50510.mail.yahoo.com> you > > wrote: > > > This may be a trivial question, but I hope that someone can answer > > > me. > > > > It's not a trivial question, but a FAQ. > > > > > While doing source level debugging under ddd, whenever I do step, > > > stepi, next or nexti I see green instruction pointer jump all over > > > the code. e.g. it would go to first line, than third line, than 7 > > > line. If I look at machine code window, it is running in normal > > > predictable way. > > > > See http://www.denx.de/twiki/bin/view/DULG/DebuggingTricks > > > > Best regards, > > > > Wolfgang Denk > > > > -- > > Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded > > Linux > > Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: > > wd(a)denx.de > > When it is incorrect, it is, at least *authoritatively* incorrect. > > - Hitchiker's Guide To The > > Galaxy > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > To: talibalm(a)hotmail.com > Cc: U-Boot List <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Debugging U-Boot Under DDD > From: Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)denx.de> > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:59:33 +0200 > > In message <20040712194303.3117.qmail(a)web50504.mail.yahoo.com> you wrote: > >=20 > > At this point if I "Cont", I get pop-up from ddd > > /.../u-boot-1.1.1/serial.c: No such file or directory. > > Sounds like a toolchain or user problem to me. > > > Just before relocating the code, I typed following statements > >=20 > > (gdb) symbol-file > > (gdb) add-symbol-file u-boot 0xbda000 > > How did you start gdb / DDD? Did you really load "u-boot" (i. e. the > ELF file)? > > > (gdb) dir cpu/mpc8xx > > (gdb) dir board/fads > > (gdb) dir tools/gdb/serial.c > > (gdb) dir drivers/serial.c > > None of these should be necessary. Which toolchain are you using? > > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > --=20 > Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux > Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd(a)denx.de > Old programmers never die, they just become managers. > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:29:57 -0700 (PDT) > From: Junita Ajith <junita_ppc(a)yahoo.com> > To: u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Help with serial port set-up for PPC 8540 > > Hi > I am trying to write an Assembly code , just to > set-up the UART , so as to send a few characters via > the serial port. > > I am working on a 8540 Motorola PowerPC . As I am > starting right from the scratch I dont have the boot > -loader doing the board initializations for me and so > have to have my own start.S file to do those . > > I just have set-up the necessary registers for > UART and as I am not doing any high level coding I > havent set up the MMU , TLB etc. But my code doesnt > seem to work !!! > > I assumed that that CPU would direclty read from > the Flash .I am new to this and so I need some advise > of what all have to be done during board bring up, or > where should I look for such documentation. > > Any help would be appreciated . > > Thanks > Junita > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > From: Michael Bendzick <michaelb(a)logicpd.com> > To: "'u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net'" > <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:59:45 -0500 > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Errant Tab in drivers/cfi_flash.c > > I noticed in the drivers/cfi_flash.c file, there's a minor error in text > formatting that makes for an ugly display when running 'flinfo'. > > I tracked it down to line 465, where either "(RO)" or blank space is > displayed, depending on the sector status. An errant tab is in there that > looked like the two spaces that ought to be there, which caused my terminal > program (Tera Term) to make the spacing between numbered sectors excessively > wide, and also cause a blank line between every data-bearing line. > > The fix (note that I'm using [tab] and [space] here for clarity): > > Line 465... > > info->start[i], info->protect[i] ? "[space](RO)" : > "[tab][space][space][space]"); > > ...should become... > > info->start[i], info->protect[i] ? "[space](RO)" : > "[space][space][space][space][space]"); > > -Michael Bendzick > Systems and Software Engineering > Logic Product Development > michael.b(a)logicpd.com > 612-436-5122 > www.logicpd.com > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > To: Junita Ajith <junita_ppc(a)yahoo.com> > Cc: u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Help with serial port set-up for PPC 8540 > From: Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)denx.de> > Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:30:31 +0200 > > In message <20040712212957.88820.qmail(a)web90006.mail.scd.yahoo.com> you w= > rote: > > > > I am trying to write an Assembly code , just to > > set-up the UART , so as to send a few characters via > > the serial port. > > Why? There is a full-blown serial driver available written in C? Is > this intended as a replacement for a missing BDI2000? Save your time, > abd buy the BDI2000 _now_. Other wise your time is just wasted, as > you will buy the BDI2000 later anyway. > > > I just have set-up the necessary registers for > > UART and as I am not doing any high level coding I > > havent set up the MMU , TLB etc. But my code doesnt > > seem to work !!! > > Forget it. U-Boot was explicitely designed to bring up a serial > console port as early as possible during initialization. OK, there > are a few things that could be saved before running the serial > driver, but this is just a tiny piece of the code you need to get > right before you will see the first character on the serial line. > > Don't try to re-invent the wheel. > > > I assumed that that CPU would direclty read from > > the Flash .I am new to this and so I need some advise > > of what all have to be done during board bring up, or > > where should I look for such documentation. > > Use the existing U-Boot code. Attach a BDI2000 and just type "ti" at > the telnet prompt, or "d/i $pc" + "si" in GDB... > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > --=20 > Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux > Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd(a)denx.de > "The good Christian should beware of mathematicians and all those who > make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that mathematicians > have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and confine > man in the bonds of Hell." - Saint Augustine > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > To: Michael Bendzick <michaelb(a)logicpd.com> > Cc: "'u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net'" <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Errant Tab in drivers/cfi_flash.c > From: Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)denx.de> > Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 00:35:55 +0200 > > In message <31ADFA827355984B9E2A161514595B561C32C0(a)lpdsrv04.logicpd.com> = > you wrote: > > I noticed in the drivers/cfi_flash.c file, there's a minor error in tex= > t > > formatting that makes for an ugly display when running 'flinfo'. > > Thanks for pointing out (mea culpa). > > > The fix (note that I'm using [tab] and [space] here for clarity): > > It would have been much more useful (and less work for me) if you had > just included a patch (see README for instructions). > > Fixed in CVS tree. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > --=20 > Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux > Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd(a)denx.de > We call our dog Egypt, because in every room he leaves a pyramid. > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:18:16 -0700 (PDT) > From: Talib Alim <talibalm(a)hotmail.com> > Reply-To: talibalm(a)hotmail.com > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Debugging U-Boot Under DDD > To: Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)denx.de>, talibalm(a)hotmail.com > Cc: U-Boot List <u-boot-users(a)lists.sourceforge.net> > > I am using eldk > > [root@lab1 eldk]# cat version > ELDK version 3.0 > ppc_8xx: Build 2004-02-16 > > I am starting ddd with following command line > > ddd --debugger /opt/eldk/usr/bin/ppc_8xx-gdb > target remote bdi:2001 > symbol u-boot > set $pc = 0x02000100 # my flash is mapped @ 0x02000000 > I am using bin {& not elf}, apart from this problem, it seems to be > doing fine. > > TA > > --- Wolfgang Denk <wd(a)denx.de> wrote: > > In message <20040712194303.3117.qmail(a)web50504.mail.yahoo.com> you > > wrote: > > > > > > At this point if I "Cont", I get pop-up from ddd > > > /.../u-boot-1.1.1/serial.c: No such file or directory. > > > > Sounds like a toolchain or user problem to me. > > > > > Just before relocating the code, I typed following statements > > > > > > (gdb) symbol-file > > > (gdb) add-symbol-file u-boot 0xbda000 > > > > How did you start gdb / DDD? Did you really load "u-boot" (i. e. > > the > > ELF file)? > > > > > (gdb) dir cpu/mpc8xx > > > (gdb) dir board/fads > > > (gdb) dir tools/gdb/serial.c > > > (gdb) dir drivers/serial.c > > > > None of these should be necessary. Which toolchain are you using? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Wolfgang Denk > > > > -- > > Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded > > Linux > > Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: > > wd(a)denx.de > > Old programmers never die, they just become managers. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot-Users mailing list > > U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users > > > End of U-Boot-Users Digest >

2 1

RE: [U-Boot-Users] Newbie question - cross
by Michael Bendzick 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

Wolfgang- I will take a look at rebuilding binutils then. As for dual emailing the bulk of the problem actually seems to have come from something between my mailserver and lists.sourceforge.net. It took 28 minutes for my first message to be sent back to me on the list, hence thinking my first email didn't work. Past performance has been closer to 3 minutes. Don't worry, I will continue to lament the use of MS Lookout(!). -Michael Bendzick -----Original Message----- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:wd@denx.de] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 6:29 PM To: Michael Bendzick Cc: U-Boot-Users (E-mail) Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Newbie question - cross In message <31ADFA827355984B9E2A161514595B561C32F1(a)lpdsrv04.logicpd.com> you wrote: > (My apologies if this email comes through twice...Outlook didn't seem to do > anything useful with it the first time I sent it.) get a better mailer then. Umm... maybe in the first step you want to installan operating system ;-) Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd(a)denx.de Quote from the Boss... "I didn't say it was your fault. I said I was going to blame it on you."

2 1

[U-Boot-Users] u-boot 1.1.1 & Intel LXT972A
by Knowledge Seeker 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

I have LXT972A on 852T. From u-boot, I have set mac, ip and netmask. When I try to ping a ip address on LAN. I get "TX timeout" I have traced this. During u-boot init, fec_initialize is called, which does not do much to comfiugre the hardware. When I ping fec_init is called in cpu/mpc8xx/fec.c and then it eventually times out in fec_send function. I have ether real running on another computer, which can see arp packet coming out of fec. So at this point what should I look next. Help. Completely lost.

2 2

RE: [U-Boot-Users] Newbie question - cross
by Michael Bendzick 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

Is there an easy way to update the PPC binutils in ELDK 3.0? Is there an estimated time of arrival for ELDK 3.1? For thoroughness, I'd like to test a patch on an 85xx board, but don't see a good way to do that yet. Thanks, -Michael Bendzick -----Original Message----- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:wd@denx.de] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:00 AM To: Jon Loeliger Cc: u-boot-users Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Newbie question - cross In message <1090334884.4910.11.camel(a)blarg.somerset.sps.mot.com> you wrote: > > I currently use this for most of my development: > > gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030217 (Yellow Dog Linux 3.0 3.2.2-2a) ...whichis identical to the tools used in ELDK 3.0 (which actually is based on YD-3.0). > I have heard a rumor of the current code not compiling > with GCC 2.95, but have not yet had a chance to verify it. > I believe it was a reported problem with an assembler > interpretation of a C macro for the TLB_MAS() handling. Yes. You need binutils 2.14 or later. See "doc/README.mpc85xxads". > You should plan on uprev'ing to a modern GCC, of course. Like ELDK 3.1 :-) Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd(a)denx.de Anything free is worth what you pay for it. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id040&op=click _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

2 1

RE: [U-Boot-Users] Newbie question - cross
by Michael Bendzick 21 Jul '04

21 Jul '04

(My apologies if this email comes through twice...Outlook didn't seem to do anything useful with it the first time I sent it.) Is there an easy way to update the PPC binutils in ELDK 3.0? Is there an estimated time of arrival for ELDK 3.1? For thoroughness, I'd like to test a patch on an 85xx board, but don't see a good way to do that yet. Thanks, -Michael Bendzick -----Original Message----- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:wd@denx.de] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:00 AM To: Jon Loeliger Cc: u-boot-users Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] Newbie question - cross In message <1090334884.4910.11.camel(a)blarg.somerset.sps.mot.com> you wrote: > > I currently use this for most of my development: > > gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030217 (Yellow Dog Linux 3.0 3.2.2-2a) ...whichis identical to the tools used in ELDK 3.0 (which actually is based on YD-3.0). > I have heard a rumor of the current code not compiling > with GCC 2.95, but have not yet had a chance to verify it. > I believe it was a reported problem with an assembler > interpretation of a C macro for the TLB_MAS() handling. Yes. You need binutils 2.14 or later. See "doc/README.mpc85xxads". > You should plan on uprev'ing to a modern GCC, of course. Like ELDK 3.1 :-) Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd(a)denx.de Anything free is worth what you pay for it. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id040&op=click _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users(a)lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

2 1

RE: [U-Boot-Users] No more omap1510inn/omap1610inn Maintainer?
by Michael Bendzick 20 Jul '04

20 Jul '04

George- Those two added lines do look good. It would be handy to have access to the second chip of user flash. Do you think it would be good to add some kind of support for the AMD boot flash? It claims to be CFI compliant, though tracking it as it moves through the memory map as the DIP switches are changed would be a bit tough. Perhaps if we updated the config file with #define's for the DIP switch settings, and based on that, it reasons out the correct memory settings for you? -Michael Bendzick -----Original Message----- From: 'George G. Davis' [mailto:gdavis@mvista.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 10:38 AM To: Michael Bendzick Cc: U-Boot-Users (E-mail) Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] No more omap1510inn/omap1610inn Maintainer? On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:35:23PM -0500, Michael Bendzick wrote: > Attached is a patch that makes the omap1510inn board use the > drivers/cfi_flash.c flash driver. > > NOTE to Wolfgang: This patch is NOT for CVS yet. > > Instead, it is for testing by other people to make sure this looks like a > good change to make to this board configuration. If reports are positive, I > will submit a patch for real. It seems to work ok for me. How about adding this: diff -u include/configs/omap1510inn.h include/configs/omap1510inn.h --- include/configs/omap1510inn.h 19 Jul 2004 20:50:28 -0000 +++ include/configs/omap1510inn.h 20 Jul 2004 15:18:48 -0000 @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ /*----------------------------------------------------------------------- * FLASH and environment organization */ -#define CFG_MAX_FLASH_BANKS 1 /* max number of memory banks */ +#define CFG_MAX_FLASH_BANKS 2 /* max number of memory banks */ #define PHYS_FLASH_SIZE 0x01000000 /* 16MB */ #define CFG_MAX_FLASH_SECT (128) /* max number of sectors on one chip */ #define CFG_ENV_ADDR (CFG_FLASH_BASE + 0x020000) /* addr of environment */ @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ #define CFG_FLASH_USE_BUFFER_WRITE 1 /* Use buffered writes (10x faster) */ #define CFG_MONITOR_BASE CFG_FLASH_BASE /* Monitor at beginning of flash */ #define CFG_MONITOR_LEN (128 << 10) /* Reserve 128kB */ +#define CFG_FLASH_BANKS_LIST { CFG_FLASH_BASE, CFG_FLASH_BASE + PHYS_FLASH_SIZE } /* timeout values are in ticks */ #ifndef CFG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER FWIW, I'm having problems running U-Boot CVS HEAD on Innovator/OMAP1510 lately. The target hangs during early init. I haven't figured out what's wrong but I'm only able to use U-Boot CVS HEAD on Innovator/OMAP1510 while the BDI2000 is connected. If I disconnect the BDI2000, the darn target hangs during early init. Unfortunately I've no time to debug the early hang problem. But that problem is independent from your CFI patch anyway. Thanks! <snip> -- Regards, George

2 2

RE: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot 1.1.1 & Intel LXT972A
by VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE) 20 Jul '04

20 Jul '04

> -----Original Message----- > From: u-boot-users-admin(a)lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of > Knowledge > Seeker > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 2:40 PM > To: U-Boot List > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] u-boot 1.1.1 & Intel LXT972A > > > I have LXT972A on 852T. From u-boot, I have set mac, ip and netmask. > When I try to ping a ip address on LAN. I get "TX timeout" > > I have traced this. During u-boot init, fec_initialize is called, > which does not do much to comfiugre the hardware. When I ping fec_init > is called in cpu/mpc8xx/fec.c and then it eventually times out in > fec_send function. > > I have ether real running on another computer, which can see arp > packet coming out of fec. > > So at this point what should I look next. > > Help. Completely lost. I understand you are pinging _from_ u-boot. If not, that is a problem. Do you see ARP replies from your ping target? If not, you have a problem with either the target machine or the ARP packet itself (most likely the former: ethereal should tell you about packet problems). Is the FEC interrupt happening? Do you see packets in the FEC Rx queue? If you are seeing ARP replies on the network, you have a ethernet receive problem. Based on others similar questions in the archives, most likely you don't have the Rx clocking configured properly. You might not have the port pins used by the ethernet Rx functions configured properly. You might not have the PHY configured correctly. gvb ****************************************** The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. ******************************************

1 0